Evaluation of nonlinear Iterative methods on pipe network // Evaluación de métodos iterativos no lineales en redes de tuberías
Abstract
Abstract
The analysis and design of pipe networks is usually a very complex task and depending of many factors. The paper here presented explores issues related to the accuracy and robustness of three iterative nonlinear methods used for designing pipe networks: Hardy Cross method, Gradient method and Newton-Raphson method. The last two methods are implemented in EPANET and Matlab, through the fsolve function. In order to evaluate the performance of each numerical method, three pipe networks, were assessed. No differences in the results were found by using fsolve (of MatLab) and Hardy-Cross methods. However, the EPANET results show differences up to 115% regarding other two methods. This behavior can be explained by the magnitude of head loss and the flow rate in some tubes of the network with errors close to the errors set up and by the Nodal Newton-Raphson method used at EPANET’s code. The Hardy Cross method proved to be robust on three evaluated cases
Key words: nonlinear methods, pipe network; EPANET; Hardy Cross method; Newton–Raphson technique.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2021-11-09 (2)
- 2021-07-21 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Guilherme da Silva Teixeira, Guillermo Vilalta Alonso, Lourival J Mendes N

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).